 |
| Image #1 |
 |
| Image #2 |
In Image #1 we see part of
a fully rolled fingerprint. Notice that the edges are cutoff so you can safely assume that
this is not a fully rolled impression. If you take a look at Image #2
you can see that I have sectioned out the center portion of this impression and labeled 10
points of identification. That was not all the points found but simply the ones
that could be mapped easily without cluttering up the image.
Image #2 when measured 1:1 is just over 1/4" square. If you look
closely you should be able to identify 10 additional points that were not mapped with the
lines. In all I counted 22 points of identification on this 1/4" square section of
the impression. One thing to note here, you might be under the impression that making a
fingerprint comparison is relatively easy but you should keep in mind a couple things.
First, Image #1 and Image #2 are both taken from the same image. In
real life you would have impressions made at separate times and subject to
different pressure distortions. Secondly, these images are relatively clean and clear
where many of the actually crime scene prints are anything but clear. Last you have to
consider that this is an easy comparison because you are blessed with having a core
pattern and a delta when in some cases you may have a latent that could be a fingertip,
palm or even foot impression. |